Though I admired the earlier films
of Alfonso Cuarón I didn’t know anything about Roma going into it. Within a
couple minutes I knew I was in Mexico City in the early 1970s.
I knew this because in the early 1970s
I was twice in Mexico City, the second time for about three months.
Roma
is loosely autobiographical and much of it takes place behind the gates of an
upper-middle class family home. Most of
the residences in Mexico City lie behind these gates and when I was there I was
acutely conscious of having no access to the lives inside them. Thus the intimacy that Cuarón reveals now
felt like a late and unlikely gift.
The Mexico that Cuarón shows us
outside the family’s gate felt very familiar: the strange random musical
paramilitary parades in the city streets, a casket business on a roadside, the
vague threats of violence from protesters or policia, the low lying fog below
the mountains in the countryside. These details
might have been drawn from my own memories.
I look forward to watching the film again to absorb more of its rich atmosphere,
now that the story is known to me.
Thinking about my own time in
Mexico, the winter of 1973–’74, I realized that I was only inside of two
homes. One was the home of the long-time
ex-pat and mountain explorer, Otis McAlister, the other was the home of a young
American couple who worked as teachers.
They kindly invited me to spend a few days recuperating at their house
after I became sick high on Iztaccihuatl, the eighth highest summit in North
America, an occasion marked by severe dehydration, mild frostbite, and brief
hospital stay.
The rest of my time there I stayed
in one-star hotels or slept in the mountains.
The occasion for me being in Mexico
was my idea to write a guidebook to climbing the volcanoes of Mexico. This plan was foiled by two facts, not the
least of which was that I did not know how to write. The other consideration was that the pleasure
of my travels was precisely in not having a guidebook on which to rely. If future mountain travelers needed a
guidebook, maybe they should go elsewhere.
Or so I thought. A guidebook in English
would be published about ten years later.
What I never lost was the feeling
that I wanted to write about the experience.
But I didn’t know what I would write and I would wildly underestimate
the amount of time it would take to shape the experience. And, when the book, Forty Crows, actually got written, almost forty years later, it was
not a book I was capable of imagining when I was twenty years old. It’s as if I shot a few rolls of film and
they sat for decades in developing trays waiting for resolution that may or may
not . . . develop.
Roma
is described as loosely autobiographical.
Who knows what that means, exactly?
And whether it matters. My own
novel is probably exponentially more loosely autobiographical. About twenty of its 400 pages might have been
written as nonfiction. And certain
details of the protagonist’s past, told in flashbacks, are stolen from
memory. It’s not me in any literal
sense. In a figurative, what if? sense, it’s all me, in the way
that all fiction is an answer to the question what if?
Shameless self promotion:
https://www.amazon.com/Forty-Crows-novel-David-Stevenson/dp/1985082683/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1546290372&sr=1-1&keywords=Forty+Crows